Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Island Flap as a Simpler Alternative for Prophylactic Ski...

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Original Research

The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Island Flap as a Simpler Alternative for Prophylactic Skin Augmentation Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty

Author:

Geoffrey G. Hallock

Divison of Plastic Surgery, St. Luke’s Sacred Heart Campus Hospital, Allentown, Pennsylvlania; Plastic Surgery: The Meeting, American Society for Plastic Surgery, Chicago, US
X close

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty is a common orthopaedic procedure of great benefit in restoring unimpeded and pain free ambulation with rare complications [1]. However, subsequent soft tissue compromise and/or joint infection can be disastrous if prosthesis salvage is impossible requiring instead knee fusion or even amputation [1]. The pre-operative presence of tenuous soft tissues, most obvious if a skin graft covers the knee region; or the existence of multiple or problematic scars should be indications for consideration of prophylactic soft tissue replacement with a flap so as to avoid these endpoints [1, 2]. This is a proven and beneficial concept where usually the medial gastrocnemius muscle or distal-based anterolateral thigh flap as a local flap has been selected, or else even a free tissue transfer [1–3]. With the advent of perforator-based cutaneous pedicled flaps, the medial sural artery perforator flap as a local island flap should be considered as another alternative to fulfill this orthoplastic approach for minimizing untoward events [4].

Keywords: Plastic surgery  
How to Cite: Hallock GG. The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Island Flap as a Simpler Alternative for Prophylactic Skin Augmentation Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty. International Journal of Orthoplastic Surgery. 2019;2(1):1–4. DOI: http://doi.org/10.29337/ijops.26
71
Views
16
Downloads
  Published on 18 Jan 2019
 Accepted on 24 Dec 2018            Submitted on 22 Nov 2018

Surgical Anatomy

At the very least, the medial sural artery perforator [MSAP] flap will capture the skin territory overlying the medial gastrocnemius muscle. The medial sural artery is the source vessel to that muscle as it is to this flap; and is a branch of the popliteal artery, originating at or about the knee joint [4]. After entering the undersurface of the muscle, most commonly the medial sural artery bifurcates to run superficial [posterior] or deep within the muscle surface [5]. Although the distribution of major medial sural artery musculocutaneous perforators that can sustain this flap can be quite variable [6, 7, 8, 9], almost always at least a single such perforator can be found [6]. On average, these can be found 13 ± 2 cm. below the popliteal crease, and 2.5 ±1 cm from the posterior midline (Figure 1) [5]; but in reality can emanate anywhere from within the medial gastrocnemius muscle. The actual possible pedicle to practically sustain an island MSAP flap depends on the location of the perforator, and can range in length from 9–16 cm [5]. Venous outflow parallels the course of the perforators. As an island flap this will usually be insensate. Since in the lower extremity interconnections between perforasomes are oriented in a longitudinal direction [11], the major axis of any MSAP flap should also parallel that pattern to avoid compromise of the distal portion if it were to cross instead obliquely into a neighboring angiosome.

Figure 1 

On average, a medial sural artery perforator [p] will be found within a semicircle of radius 2 cm. about 8 cm. below the popliteal crease along a line drawn from the latter’s midpoint to the prominence of the medial malleolus [10].

Surgical Technique

The patient usually will be positioned supine with the thigh abducted, lower leg externally rotated, and knee slightly flexed. Use of a mid-thigh tourniquet is optional, but exsanguination only by elevation is important to maintain fill of venae comitantes to permit their better visualization yet insure a bloodless field that will not obscure any perforators during their dissection. Next, the removal of any skin graft, unstable scars, or unsuitable skin about the knee joint will determine the flap surface area required for replacement as measured by a template.

The actual flap design overlying the calf cannot be outlined until the precise location where the requisite perforator pierces the deep fascia is known. The surgeon should use whatever preoperative technique they are comfortable with to allow its identification, although the audible Doppler still remains the most universal method. An exploratory subfascial incision should be made anterior to this estimated point for direct visualization and confirmation of the perforator existence and adequacy of its size (Figure 2). The template and subsequent flap design should then be placed eccentrically as distal as possible to that point with a vertical axis to insure that the longest possible pedicle for an island flap will be obtained. If 2 reasonable perforators are found, chosing the more distal perforator will increase pedicle length and extend flap reach. However, inclusion of both perforators not only will be a safety factor in case one were injured during the subsequent dissection; but insures that unacceptable twisting of the pedicle does not occur during flap transfer.

Figure 2 

(A) Removal of hardware after a healed tibial plateau fracture left a hollow from subcutaneous tissue deficiency along the medial border of the proximal tibia and recurrent seromas, prior to proposed total knee arthroplasty to restore pain free ambulation, (B) reentry into the distal half of the vertical paramedian scar left a 4 × 13 cm. aperture, (C) anterior border subfascial exploratory incision confirmed a perforator at point “×” found initially with use of an audible Doppler, with then an eccentric design of the flap of dimensions comparable to the knee defect was made to maximize potential pedicle length, (D) after incising and retracting the medial border of the flap, actually 2 large perforator were found [on microgrids] and retained, (E) these joined quite proximally after completion of their intramuscular dissection [p = perforator, MG = medial gastrocnemius muscle split, MS = medial sural branches], (F) providing a single long vascular leash to allow the MSAP flap to easily be transposed into the knee defect, (G) and healed flap allowing subsequent total knee replacement without concern. (H) Note the conspicuous linear donor site scar in the calf that is to be expected.

The exploratory incision is then extended to include the entire medial or anterior flap boundary. A rapid subfascial exploration while pushing away the medial gastrocnemius muscle should complete exposure of the desired perforator(s) as the flap falls posteriorly without tension (Figure 2). Now unimpeded unroofing, then intramuscular dissection of the perforator back to its origin from a branch of the medial sural vessels requires clipping or coagulation of side branches as encountered, while carefully preserving motor nerve branches. Proximal dissection of the source vessel must continue until the pedicle length is long enough for transposition of the flap through a subcutaneous tunnel to the knee region where required.

Before insetting the flap, in situ flap perfusion must be adequate with control of any bleeding points. The medial gastrocnemius muscle rent can be closed with a running absorbable suture as long as the flap pedicle is not threatened. Closure of the deep fascia is not attempted for fear of creating a compartment syndrome [12]. For similar reasons, if primary skin closure without tension is not possible, a skin graft placed on the muscle would be proper.

Discussion

The medial sural artery perforator flap was originally heralded as a promising thin free flap donor site [13], most ideal for the ipsilateral distal lower extremity [14].

Because of its potentially long vascular pedicle based on the medial sural vessels, reach as an island flap NOT requiring a microanastomosis for knee coverage is another asset [4]. As such, it represents a function preservation alternative to the more commonly used medial gastrocnemius muscle local flap [15].

Casey, et al [2] found that wound healing complications after total knee replacement were virtually non-existent if some form of prophylactic flap [and usually the medial gastrocnemius muscle or instead a free flap] were first performed for that subset of patients where knee soft tissue compromise existed that would be predictable to otherwise fail. In their series, the choice of a cutaneous as opposed to a muscle flap resulted in superior knee flexion and total range of motion, supposedly because the latter had more fibrosis and rigidity [2]. They also confirmed the value of this orthoplastic approach in preventing the high number of failures if instead salvage techniques following total knee replacement had to be utilized.

Few local cutaneous flap options such as peninsular [16] or advancement flaps [17] usually remain as potential tissue augmentation options about the knee that has had multiple prior operations or otherwise significant trauma. The medial sural artery perforator flap from the calf is another nearby alternative that should be considered, although this does require familiarity with dissection of musculocutaneous perforators [18]. A major detriment, however, is the donor site deformity that at the least will be a non-aesthetic scar in the calf; or worse if a skin graft on the medial gastrocnemius muscle is required. Minimizing the chance of later failure of a total knee replacement should instead be well worth this risk.

Acknowledgements

Plastic Surgery the Meeting September 30, 2018.

Funding Statement

There was no funding received for this paper.

Competing Interests

The author has no competing interests to declare.

Author Contributions

GG Hallock sole contributor, takes responsibility for the integrity of the work, and made all publishing decisions.

Guarantor

GG Hallock sole guarantor.

Peer Review

This is a non-commissioned paper that has undergone external peer review according to journal policy.

References

  1. Colen, DL, Carney, MJ, Shubinets, V, Lanni, MA, Liu, T, Levin, LS, Lee, GC and Kovach, SJ. Soft-Tissue Reconstruction of the Complicated Knee Arthroplasty: Principles and Predictors of Salvage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141: 1040–1048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004255 

  2. Casey, WJ III, Rebecca, AM, Krochmal, DJ, Kim, HY, Hemminger, BJ, Clarke, HD, Spangehl, MJ and Smith, AA. Prophylactic Flap Reconstruction of the Knee Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty in High-risk Patients. Annal Plast Surg. 2011; 66: 381–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181e37c04 

  3. Markovich, GD, Dorr, LD, Klein, NE, McPherson, EJ and Vince, KG. Muscle Flaps in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; 321: 122–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199512000-00019 

  4. Hallock, GG. The Medial Sural Medial Gastrocnemius Perforator Local Flap. Annal Plast Surg. 2004; 53: 501–505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000116338.59679.12 

  5. Dusseldorp, JR, Pham, QJ, Ngo, W, Gianoutsos, M and Moradi, P. Vascular Anatomy of the Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap: A New Classification System of Intra-muscular Branching Patterns. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014; 67: 1267–1275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.05.016 

  6. Hallock, GG. Anatomic basis of the Gastrocnemius Perforator-based Flap. Annal Plast Surg. 2001; 47: 517–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200111000-00008 

  7. Kim, HH, Jeong, JH, Seul, JH and Cho, BC. New Design and Identification of the Medial Sural Perforator Flap: An Anatomical Study and its Clinical Applications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117: 1609–1618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000207077.19601.86 

  8. Kosutic, D, Pejkovic, B, Anderhuber, F, Vadnjal-Donlagic, S, Zic, R, Gulic, R, Kranjnc, I, Solman, L and Kocbek, L. Complete Mapping of Lateral and Medial Sural Artery Perforators: Anatomical Study with Duplex-Doppler Ultrasound Correlation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012; 65: 1530–1536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.04.045 

  9. Wong, MZ, Wong, CH, Tan, KB, Chew, KY and Tay, SC. Surgical Anatomy of the Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012; 28: 555–560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1315778 

  10. Hallock, GG. A Primer of Schematics to Facilitate the Design of the Preferred Muscle Perforator Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123: 1107–1115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318199f7d2 

  11. Saint-Cyr, M, Wong, C, Schaverien, M, Mojallal, A and Rohrich, RJ. The Perforasome Theory: Vascular Anatomy and Clinical Implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1529–1544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b98a6c 

  12. Addison, PD, Lannon, D and Neligan, PC. Compartment Syndrome After Closure of the Anterolateral Thigh Flap Donor Site: A Report of Two Cases. Annal Plast Surg. 2008; 60: 635–638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181453b7a 

  13. Cavadas, PC, Sanz-Gimenez-Rico, JR, Gutierrez-de la Camara, A, Navarro-Monzonis, A, Soler-Nomdedeu, S and Martinez-Soriano, F. The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Free Flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 108: 1609–1615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200111000-00027 

  14. Hallock, GG. Medial Sural Artery Perforator Free Flap: Legitimate Use as a Solution for the Ipsilateral Distal Lower Extremity Defect. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014; 30: 187–192. 

  15. Daigeler, A, Drücke, D, Tatar, K, Homann, HH, Goertz, O, Tilkorn, D, Lehnhardt, M and Steinau, HU. The Pedicled Gastrocnemius Muscle Flap: A Review of 218 Cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123: 250–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181904e2e 

  16. Hallock, GG. Local Knee Random Fasciocutaneous Flaps. Annal Plast Surg. 1989; 23: 289–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198910000-00004 

  17. Kim, JT, Ho, SYM and Kim, YH. An Improved Perforator-based Island Flap: The Heart Balloon Flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135: 1472–1475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001153 

  18. Hallock, GG. Is There a “Learning Curve” for Muscle Perforator Flaps? Annal Plast Surg. 2008; 60: 146–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e318056d6dc 

comments powered by Disqus